« More work? Leave me alone! | Main | That man can go to Hell! »
April 18, 2005
Disincentive to work
The United States believes itself to be a meritocracy. We would like to think that anything an individual receives, she receives because she has earned it. Am I wrong about that? I must be, because so many have embraced the destruction of the inheritance tax...
It strikes me as strange-- if I do a job and my employer pays me for it, the government takes a percentage of my income. This creates a disincentive (in some proportion to the tax) to work. And yet, by and large, we feel that what we get out of the taxation (roads, police, social security, etc) is worth more than the inefficiency caused by the disincentive. Congress recently passed a bill which would privilege some forms of wealth-gain over others, privilege inheritance over work...
Does this seem right? Is this in keeping with our meritocratic leanings? Assuredly not! It seems wrong that masses of wealth can be passed along, creating fortunate clans which privilege their scions above the common lot of Americans. But to say that such things are so much in the public interest that creating wealth will be taxed while passing wealth along to one’s heirs will not-- this is monstrous...
Which discounts the effects. Slativist notes that "Elimination of the estate tax would result in a decrease in charitable giving of up to 12 percent." As Slate notes, an awful lot of charitable giving is done at death. Embarrassment of riches and all that...
This doesn’t even account for the huge whole the repeal of any tax will leave in our federal budget. In a time of war, when the largest chunk of our debt is owned by our largest competitor (china), we simply cannot afford to kill a revenue stream. Nonetheless, that’s what our congress has decided to do. Gods help us all...
Posted by Andrew at April 18, 2005 09:48 AM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.punningpundit.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/693
Comments
I am not all that crazy about any tax, especially after payday or April 15th, I see all that money flying off. I am not sure how much of an impact this will really have. The uber-rich people already have lawyers that can find most any loophole as is, where as Joe Blow may actually now be able to use the tragedy of a death and improve his life. Maybe invest, start a business, or send their child to a better school.
I believe that people appreciate and value something more if they actually have to work for it. I think that most wealthy people realize that to, and will continue to donate to help make the world a better place. I am not sure if this will affect charitable giving as much as people may fear. But than, I do not personally know any rich people to base this on.
Posted by: dark_indy at April 18, 2005 03:18 PM
The repeal of the death tax is good. We need more people like Paris Hilton setting an example for our children.
Posted by: Ara Rubyan at April 20, 2005 03:42 AM
I'm not surprised at all. The GOP is taking care of its backers. This tax break isn't going to create any new jobs, its just going to be brand new ferraris for a dying rich man's grandchildren.
Posted by: Alexa at April 20, 2005 02:49 PM
Please, Please tell me that article was fully tongue in cheek!
This bill does very precious little for the rich, and is almost exclusively for the poor/under-privledged.
Yeah yeah, keep bitching about the rich brats. They're so horrible. The inherited all this money, without having to work. BEFORE THIS BILL! BEFORE BEFORE BEFORE BEFORE BEFORE BEFORE BEFORE BEFORE BEFORE.
Loud enough for you? Do you think it made one iota of difference to the money rich brats inherit? I'm sure they'll get a few extra million to go along with the billion they're already getting. Drops in the bucket.
Now, look at the poor. When Mommy dies, you don't lose the mobile home cause of taxes. When Daddy get's chewed up in the combine, you don't lose the farm you've worked on your whole life, due to taxes.
We're not talking about simple taxes on things like cash, oh no, we're talking about taxes on property, like land, and homes. Not taxing trust funds, but taxing the necessities of life out from under you.
What happens when the almost %50 Death tax on land hits a poor farming family. That's %50 of the value of the land due upon death, payable in cash only. Do you think farmers have that kind of money? No. What ends up happening is they have to sell 50% of thier farm, to pay for taxes leveled on them, and now have 1/2 a farm, and NO money. How's Paris fit anywhere near that abomination of government greed and larceny?
How about the family who spent 20 years paying off thier home, who have lived paycheck to paycheck most of thier lives? Think they get away with gobs of money? Nope, 50% due now, thank you, says Uncle Sam. And Sam, he doesn't care that if you sell the house, quickly enough to not incur penalties, you get less value, he only cares what it appraised at, and what's due him. Forget that people probably lived in the house. Even thought they might have owned the house, made things better for thier families in the long run. Nope.
It's not the rich who will benefit from this, but the tired, the miserable, the poor.
I'll grant any lessening in tax collection will cause the budget to be a bit screwy for a while. But there's not such a big hole, not in the long run. The money kept by people, will either help make them more productive, invested, or will be spent. The first means more tax revenue from income, and the last two mean taxing the money like it is now.
Which brings me to the point nobody wanted to touch about this... At least one of the 4-5 times you pay taxes on the same money is being abolished... Try inheriting some money, pay the death tax on it, and then try and do anything with it that won't get it taxed again.
Rand.
Posted by: Rand. at April 21, 2005 06:40 AM
Rand,
The poor, dispossessed people who inherit more than US$3million? How are those events possibly coincident?
Posted by: Andrew Cory at April 25, 2005 10:48 PM